Executive Summary
Across 235 articles, our hit rate is 80.2% and our average signal return is 22.4%, so the overall record is still solid this run. Among the tiers with meaningful sample sizes, Sell is performing best on both accuracy and average signal return, while Buy is the weakest this run; Strong Sell is also working well, but with fewer calls than Sell.
This is one in a recurring series that reviews LF0 Research’s own past ratings against what actually happened to the stock. The goal is an honest scorecard, not a highlight reel — full methodology and every call we’ve ever made is at /research-performance/.
If You’d Followed Every Pick
Beyond individual calls, here’s the model portfolio question: what if you’d put $1 into every Buy/Strong Buy pick the day we published it, and a separate $1 short into every Sell/Strong Sell pick? We’ve rated stocks at very different times — some calls go back to June 2026, others were made last week — so each pick’s $1 only joins its book on its own publish date. The return below is pooled value versus total capital actually deployed at each point in time, not a return measured from one shared start date.
- Long book: -3.7% on 6 pick(s), $1 each. $6.00 deployed is worth $5.78 today.
- Short book: +22.5% on 75 pick(s), $1 each. $75.00 deployed is worth $91.87 today.
- Combined, long + short (i.e. every pick since we started): +20.6% on 81 pick(s), $1 each. $81.00 deployed is worth $97.65 today.
For comparison, here’s what the same $81.00 would have returned in a lump-sum buy-and-hold of the broad market since our first tracked pick (2026-06-09). This isn’t an identical methodology, since our capital went in gradually rather than all at once, but it’s the closest honest same-period reference point:
- S&P 500 (SPY): -0.0%. $81.00 would be worth $80.96 today.
- Nasdaq-100 (QQQ): -8.4%. $81.00 would be worth $74.20 today.
This Week’s Calls
BW — Sell (Notable mover — best active signal return)
What happened: We entered at $17.76 and the latest price is $3.10, for a stock return of -82.5%.
Why: Our Sell call held up because the stock did not need a turnaround story to justify the downside; it kept falling instead. The original conclusion leaned on the 2026 debt maturity, negative EBITDA, and negative operating cash flow, and the market has continued to punish that unresolved balance-sheet and cash-generation risk.
SMR — Strong Sell (Notable mover — best active signal return)
What we said: We said SMR depended on backlog conversion, funding needs, project execution, and whether the valuation was already pricing in too much success. Our original view was that the commercialization story was real, but the stock was asking investors to pay for a lot of execution that had not yet been proven.
What happened: We entered at $8.81 and the latest price is $4.37, for a stock return of -50.4%.
Why: Our Strong Sell thesis has been supported so far because the stock has moved lower rather than rewarding the very high commercialization expectations. The specific concern about valuation outrunning cash burn and execution risk has held up, since the market has not been willing to pay up for the story in the meantime.
CIFR — Sell (Notable mover — best active signal return)
What happened: We entered at $21.85 and the latest price is $5.55, for a stock return of -74.6%.
Why: Our Sell call has been validated by the price action, which has moved sharply against the stock. The original concern was that the valuation was ahead of a business still in transition, and the market has continued to reprice that gap lower.
NLST — Sell (Notable mover — worst active signal return)
What we said: – Rated sell because the stock prices in cleaner cash conversion than Netlist has delivered.
- Strongest point: Q1 2026 revenue reached $104.9M, with EBITDA turning positive at $8.6M.
- Biggest risk: operating cash flow was -$15.5M TTM, so earnings are not yet self-funding.
- Valuation is rich at 5.3x EV/revenue and 48.7x EV/EBITDA.
- I would raise my rating if quarterly revenue stays above $100M and operating cash flow turns positive.
What happened: We entered at $2.44 and the latest price is $5.20, for a stock return of +113.1%.
Why: This call has been wrong so far because the market rewarded the revenue and EBITDA improvement faster than we expected. The specific warning about cash flow not yet being self-funding has not mattered enough to offset the stronger operating momentum and rerating.
SDGR — Sell (Notable mover — worst active signal return)
What we said: – Rated sell valuation still prices in growth that cash flow has not earned.
- Strongest point: the platforms gross margin is 56.9% TTM.
- Biggest risk: operating cash flow is -$126.9M TTM.
- Valuation is rich at 3.9x EV/Revenue and 5.1x P/S.
- I would only improve the rating if free cash flow turns positive and revenue growth re-accelerates.
What happened: We entered at $17.40 and the latest price is $28.77, for a stock return of +65.3%.
Why: Our Sell thesis has not held up because the stock moved materially higher despite the cash burn we highlighted. The valuation concern was the right risk to flag, but the market has been willing to look through it for now rather than wait for free cash flow to turn positive.
FISV — Sell (Notable mover — worst active signal return)
What we said: – Rated sell revenue is softening while margins and leverage remain under pressure.
- Core strength: recurring processing and services revenue was 80% of 2025 revenue.
- Core risk: Q2 2026 revenue was 5.3B, down from 5.5B a year earlier.
- Valuation looks cheap on earnings at 8.7x trailing P/E, but not on momentum.
- I would raise my rating only if revenue reaccelerates and operating margin stays above 30.0%.
What happened: We entered at $45.38 and the latest price is $62.74, for a stock return of +38.3%.
Why: This call has been wrong so far because the stock has rallied even though the revenue softness we pointed to was still part of the setup. The original thesis was too cautious relative to how much the market was willing to pay for the recurring-fee franchise and earnings base.
How Each Rating Did
Buy — 6 call(s)
Buy has been mixed on a small six-call sample, so we should not overread the 50.0% accuracy. GFI was the best contributor, while SM was the weakest, which is a reminder that this tier has not been consistent enough to call a durable edge yet.
Hold — 154 call(s)
Hold remains the largest bucket, but its 55.8% accuracy and slightly negative average stock return show that it has been more of a cautious placeholder than a strong signal. JBL was the steadiest name, while TEAM moved the most, which fits a tier that often captures very different outcomes.
Sell — 57 call(s)
Sell is the clearest strength in the book this run, with 85.0% accuracy across 57 calls and the strongest average signal return among the larger tiers. BW helped the most, while NLST hurt the most, and that split shows we have generally been right to press downside risk even though a few names have ripped against us.
Strong Sell — 18 call(s)
Strong Sell is also working well, but we should keep the 18-call sample in mind before treating it as a permanent pattern. SMR has been the standout positive example, while ENPH was the weakest, so the tier has been directionally useful without being flawless.
Sector Tilt
How the calls we’re actively tracking are distributed across sectors:
| Sector | Long | Short | Hold | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 0 | 25 | 28 | 53 |
| Industrials | 1 | 14 | 26 | 41 |
| Healthcare | 2 | 9 | 20 | 31 |
| Basic Materials | 2 | 2 | 13 | 17 |
| Energy | 1 | 5 | 11 | 17 |
| Consumer Cyclical | 0 | 4 | 13 | 17 |
| Consumer Defensive | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Financial Services | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 |
| Communication Services | 0 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| Utilities | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Real Estate | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Unclassified | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Cumulative Signal Return
Lessons This Week
The common thread in this week’s spotlight is that our bearish calls worked best when the original thesis was anchored in a concrete mismatch between price and cash generation, leverage, or financing risk. The misses came when we underestimated how quickly the market would reward improving revenue or operating momentum before cash flow fully caught up, so we should keep separating temporary operating improvement from true self-funding economics.
Conclusion
Putting it all together: a $1 long book of every Buy/Strong Buy pick is at $0.96 (-3.7%) across 6 picks; and a $1 short book of every Sell/Strong Sell pick is at $1.22 (+22.5%) across 75 picks.
So far, the short book has outpaced the long book.
This is a running scorecard, not a finished one — both books will keep changing as more picks join and more tracking windows close. We’ll keep restating this comparison every week.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Ratings are tracked for 182 days from publication, then frozen as a permanent record.
Leave a Comment