This is a Scorecard review, revisiting a past LF0 research call against what actually happened.
Ticker: BSX Rating: Buy Published: 2026-06-14 Entry price: $46.76 Latest price: $49.86 as of 2026-08-25 Stock return since entry: +6.6% Signal return: +6.6% Verdict: Correct so far
This call is still open — LF0 tracks every directional call for 182 days from publication, then freezes the verdict permanently. This one’s tracking window closes 2026-12-13.
Read the original LF0 analysis
What I Said
I argued that Boston Scientific was still a constructive buy because the operating picture was improving across growth, profitability, and cash flow. I pointed to Q1 2026 revenue growth of 11.6%, EBITDA growth of 32.3%, and net income growth of 99.0%, plus $2,807.1M in trailing free cash flow, and I said the valuation looked reasonable if management could keep margins expanding while integrating acquisitions. The main risks I highlighted were reimbursement pressure and execution on acquisition-led expansion.
Peer Comparison
| Company | Return Since Entry |
|---|---|
| BSX (this call) | +6.6% |
| ABT | +31.0% |
| EW | +5.3% |
| MDT | +15.2% |
| SYK | +7.9% |
| ZBH | +14.4% |
Why It’s Working (Or Not)
So far, following my buy call would have earned about 6.6%, which means the stock has moved in the direction I wanted. The peer group has been mixed to higher overall, but BSX has still held up well alongside names like EW, MDT, SYK, and ZBH, which supports my view that the company’s fundamentals were not a one-off story. I do not think the result yet proves the full thesis, but the specific evidence I cited — strong revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow growth — has not been contradicted by the price action. What I cannot claim yet is that reimbursement risk or acquisition execution has been fully validated, because those were the swing factors that could still change the story.
What Could Still Prove Me Wrong
If revenue growth slows materially from the 11.6% pace I cited, or if margin expansion stalls instead of continuing, that would weaken the core of my thesis. I would also reconsider the call if reimbursement pressure starts showing up in results or if acquisition integration begins to hurt profitability and cash flow rather than support them. A clear deterioration in free cash flow from the $2,807.1M TTM level would be another concrete sign that my original view was too optimistic.
The June 2026 Cohort
Other directional calls published the same month:
| Ticker | Rating | Entry | Latest | Stock Return | Signal Return | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKYH | Sell | $9.37 | $10.66 | +13.8% | -13.8% | Incorrect so far |
| SOUN | Sell | $7.33 | $7.05 | -3.8% | +3.8% | Correct so far |
| AEHR | Sell | $115.30 | $95.59 | -17.1% | +17.1% | Correct so far |
| CAR | Sell | $186.28 | $145.13 | -22.1% | +22.1% | Correct so far |
| BW | Sell | $17.76 | $7.83 | -55.9% | +55.9% | Correct so far |
Live LF0 scorecard: The Scorecard | Research Performance dashboard
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Returns use LF0’s daily-close scorecard methodology.
Leave a Comment