One company met our criteria from the three 10-K annual reports filed with the SEC on 11 August 2026. To qualify, a company must have filed an annual 10-K report on the target date and have a prior-year 10-K available for a direct year-over-year comparison. A prior-year filing was not available for Global Arena Holding, Inc. and GPO Plus, Inc., so they are excluded from the ranking.
SEC What Changed Methodology
Each company is scored on how similar its current annual filing text is to the prior year. Scores run from 0 to 1 — a score of 1 means the language is essentially unchanged; a lower score means more has changed. We flag three sections that carry the most disclosure signal: Business, Risk Factors, and MD&A. Recent research suggests that lower scores indicate that a company has made significant changes to their filings, these changes are often buried in the filings. If a company was to report positive news, they would likely do so in the form of a press release or statement on their website. The large changers have often underperformed in the market, while the stable-language filers have earned positive abnormal returns.
Key Takeaways
- CARDINAL HEALTH INC (Low) — This filing comparison does not reveal a material new development for Cardinal Health.
Ranking Table
| Rank | Company | CIK | Full Filing Similarity | Business Similarity | Risk Factors Similarity | MD&A Similarity | Most Changed Section | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CARDINAL HEALTH INC | 721371 | 0.998 | n/a | n/a | n/a | N/A | low |
CARDINAL HEALTH INC
| Rank | 1 |
|---|---|
| Lowest similarity section | N/A |
| Assessment | low |
| SEC filings | 2026 10-K HTML/iXBRL (SEC page, raw text) | 2025 10-K HTML/iXBRL (SEC page, raw text) |
Based on the sections supplied, Cardinal Health did not show any meaningful year-over-year disclosure change. There is no evidence here of a new strategic direction, added risk, or shift in financial condition. This looks like a routine filing update rather than a signal event.
No material section-level wording change was large enough to quote from the compared sections.
Why SEC Filing Changes Matter
Research by Cohen et al. (Lazy Prices, 2020) — using the complete history of SEC filings from 1995 to 2014 — shows that when firms make active changes to their annual disclosures, those changes convey an important signal about future operations and returns. A portfolio that shorted "changers" and bought "non-changers" earned over 22% per year in annual alpha historically. Changes to the Risk Factors section, Business description, and language referring to the executive team were especially informative. Critically, these returns accrued gradually as information was later revealed through news and earnings — not at the time of filing — suggesting many investors remain inattentive to these simple, public signals. This snapshot is a starting point for deeper investigation, not a buy or sell recommendation.
For more like this, see the full SEC What Changed archive, browse more equity research reports, or subscribe to Quantitative Research Notes for new filing-change alerts as soon as they publish.
Leave a Comment